Liverpool are threatening to make themselves into the laughing stock of the Premier League with their failure to admit Luis Suárez is anything but a perfect little angel.Now the club has got to the stage in which their star striker was seen wearing a shirt in support of himself. It’s a curiosity that has come from the club trying to create a siege-mentality like many clubs do but it’s surely too transparent to work.
Liverpool has always been a club that has prided itself on its connection with its own fans. It’s quite an achievement for there still to be some connection between the club and fans in the modern era of football in which investors and marketing partners have replaced the old connection with the club’s true supporters.
Since the return of “King” Kenny Dalglish to Liverpool has been a massive boost for the club since the dark times with the slow decline of Rafael Benítez and then the depressing reign of George Gillett and Tom Hicks. Now with John W. Henry and the resurgent Kenny Dalglish the club seems to have got it’s act together once more to challenge for the league.
Or has it? With the club’s recent reaction to the Patrice Evra / Luis Suárez incident you would be forgiven for thinking the Liverpool Football Club PR department was run by a various assortment of passionate scouse bloggers.
Firstly way before the decision was in, Liverpool completely ignored the FA’s request that both clubs do not comment on the case as it is in motion. This would be to avoid affecting the outcome and causing it to be blown all out of proportion. Liverpool probably did not succeed in the first and certainly have accomplished the second. Surprisingly even Manchester United were able tokeep completely quiet about the entire situation. Sir Alex Ferguson did not comment on it where as Kenny Dalglish could barely contain himself.
Most pathetic of all was Wednesday’s attempt to show solidarity and develop a siege mentality when, in pre-match training, before the 0-0 against Wigan Athletic the entire team (yes, Suárez included) and manager wore t-shirts in support of Luis Suárez as if he had just been handed a lifetime ban – not just 8 games (before appeal). It’s one step away from black armbands and a minute’s silence – all for one player who called another player “negrito”.
Judging from Liverpool’s statements they released after the hearing you would assume Luis Suárez had been given his 8 game ban for being racist. Not so, – yet Liverpool repeatedly state that he isn’t – the FA (via an independent regulatory commission) have though banned him simply for using an insulting word with a reference to Evra’ skin colour.
Some Liverpool fans and, strikingly, the club itself have said there is a lack of evidence that Suárez said anything at all to Patrice Evra in spite of the fact that the player himself admitted to it. The FA and the Independent Regulatory Commission would not do anything had their been no evidence at all – the can of worms that could be opened up by one player’s word being seen as more truthful than the others would not be easy to deal with. Indeed, some Liverpool fans who use the “lack of evidence” defence will quickly tell you that also Evra is alleged to have called Suárez a “South American” in a derogatory way – ignoring the fact that this allegation has even far less evidence than the “negrito” one.
The word “negrito” itself is a funny one – the FA have had to deal with the difference in culture and language when reaching this verdict, probably the main reason for the delay in coming to a decision. Indeed, although it’s unlikely that what Luis Suárez said had any real malicious intend or was a sign of racism is unlikely. Gamesmanship and an ignorance of what is proper to say is much more likely. Although it maybe a slip of his native tongue when speaking to a Frenchman you expect their common language would be English, and this is where the word breaks down into something less savoury.
Regardless of any linguistic arguments the FA are dead right to punish Suárez on using the word even if it is something that is taught in Spanish 101. Referring to someone by his or her race, whether friendly or not (and in a football match, it’s rarely going to be friendly) is not something to be tolerated in football. Liverpool Football Club have to acknowledge this and have some sort of admission on their own player’s part even if it is through gritted teeth – anything else or the sort is bad publicity for the club.
Finally we must point out Liverpool’s attempt to lower the reputation of Patrice Evra from a professional footballer into someone who tries to play the race card in a game of poker – it is simply not true. There indeed have been two previous incidents of possible racial abuse linked to Patrice Evra before, let’s explore them more thoroughly:
First was the incident sometime back in that Patrice Evra refused to take further, in which a deaf fan that using lip-reading skills had apparently seen Steve Finnan racially abuse the left-back. Evra was unaware of any of this and left it as it was – not really someone playing the race card.
The second, and more famous, incident was the confrontation between some of the United coaching staff and Patrice Evra against the some of the Chelsea ground’s staff. Patrice Evra once again did not play the race card here – in the official report of the incident he claimed never to have heard a racial remark. Assistant manager Mike Phelan and goalkeeping coach Richard Hartis put this forward instead.
What Liverpool have insinuated about Patrice Evra is perhaps far worse than the fact that two players had a dispute over a word with some ambiguity in one of the most heated and furious matches in football. The club have shown absolutely no respect to Patrice Evra – seeming to accuse him of something that is simply made up. Liverpool should apologise to the Patrice Evra and give up on their campaign against the great conspiracy and safe face whilst they still can.
It has taken two months for the FA to examine everything and deliver its first verdict but there is no way it is going to end here. First, Luis Suárez is set to appeal, and then the issue could be pushed further and further and it’s very unlikely Luis Suárez will actually serve an 8-match ban. The only loser in this though so far is Liverpool Football Club and not Luis Suárez.

Pal
December 22, 2011
How do you know that he used the word ‘negrito’? Please tell me?
cjfox21
December 22, 2011
Regarding the ‘South American’ insult, Evra admitted it in his testimony to the FA.
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
Suárez admitted to it, that was the first clue.
Marty
December 22, 2011
Thats an easy one….With all the leaking coming out of LFC, Suarez admitted to using that insulting word…. The only suprising thing is how long it took them to find him guilty. Even John Terry denied using racist words and he could be heard by the whole world saying them. Suarez is so thck he admitted it! easy case for the FA me thinks.
Danny
December 23, 2011
coz Suarez got himself a Scouse solicitor with 2 gcses and got him to admit to using it and his plastic defence was that it is not offensive in his country! well like all immigrants in this country he has to live by these laws, case closed! ANd im sure reminding evra of his skin colour was essential in their disagreement in footballing matters! you stupid illiterate moron!
Bill
December 22, 2011
Paul McGrath is shooting his mouth off about the T Shirts. One reader wrote this in:
Hernan Morales
In referrence to the last line of this article, this man certainly DOES NOT understand the cultural differences. Being from Uruguay myself, my loving mixed-race parents refer to me as “negro” or “negrito”… and I’m not even black.
I call my wife “Negra” my daughters “Negrita”… my pals are commonly referred to as “Negro” and “Negrito” and so-on and so-forth. EVEN in a heated discussion I will use the term “Tranquilo negro” (“calm down lad”) or “Todo bien negro” (“sure mate”) and the person could be Chinese for that matter, it is synonymous to “mate”, “dude” and does not reference in any way, shape or form the colour of the person’s skin or racial physical features.
The simple fact that the term was used in SPANISH by a latin american person and “not” in English points straight to that CULTURAL difference that the F.A. overlook and therefore p*ss all over the CULTURE thing. If he used it in English (which he is shocklingly bad at), fair enough, some point of controversy could be understood, but that was not the case and it is an ugly witch hunt.
Had this guy been an Argentine or Mexican I would have been equally as vocal about such a thing. I could not give a hoot about LFC, but i do give a hoot when issues that I know a lot about are interpreted backwards and someone is being judged to this extent through the ignorance of the so-called authorities.
Evra has the right not to know about Latin american spanish particularities, but the F.A. certainly does NOT have that right. On the contrary, they have the obligation to learn about it and understand it to put it into context.
Ok, I’ve blown off some steam, hope this helps at least a few people to understand the issue from a CULTURAL point of view, straight from a fully bilingual Uruguayan.
LikeReply
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
The different is that Luis Suárez and Patrice Evra are not pals. You cannot say that to just anyone.
morales
December 22, 2011
Excellent answer. Evra has never been Suarez’s Friend. plus… Suarez called Evra Negrito, not in a normal tea time … but in the most heated game. he said it out of anger. that is it
Jonas
December 23, 2011
Sorry totally wrong as i have lived in Uruguay and Brazil, and no such expression is used by women or children and is generally used as a negative term their too!
Hernan Morales
December 23, 2011
Jonas…What?… Bill – you are most welcome to quote my comment originally posted in the independent.ie and i had hoped it would be replicated to as many places as possible by others, so it has happened as I had hoped. Now, Jonas – for you to claim having lived in my country URUGUAY and to have the nerve to say what I have explained is untrue is thorughly insulting and ridiculous. I was born there and lived, studied, milk & damn cookies there amongst the other 3 million people in URUGUAY, my children are Uruguayan and I am bleeding Uruguayan to the core… so go and read my post 100 times over please until it sticks to your mind and do me a favour and shut it if you are clueless about Uruguay.
Hernan Morales
January 11, 2012
Who said that you have to be the persons friend for it to be an amicable term to use?
It can be used in even the most aggressive situations regardless of race.
Of course, if you purposefully drop it into a sentence with racially discriminative intent it does take on that tone.
Evra says he heard “Porque tu eres negro”.. Suarez says he said “Porque negro?”
Evra has explained he has bad spanish, so he interpreted wrong, period.
Apart from the fact Uruguayans don’t use “tu eres”.. we use “sos”, so if anything he should have claimed “Porque sos Negro”… so Suarez’s version is absolutely more solid on the base of Evra’s bad Spanish and that the conversation was in Spanish, never in English.
Neil
December 22, 2011
Are you people aware of what started all this…. Poor little Evra started this feud off by calling Suarez SUDACA which is very insulting.
SUDACA. Evra called Suarez this before Suarez opened his mouth!!!!
A Spanish colloquial term used most typically in Spain to denote people from Latin America in a derogatory or pejorative way. The term is associated with immigrants from Latin America with Amerindian physical features and who speak with accented Spanish of varied origins and is believed to have originated during the popular Movida madrileña (Madrid Movement) in the 1980s as a result of Latin American Immigration. Due to the rapid influx of Latin American immigrants to Spain from the early 1990s to present, the word has evolved into a common, yet highly offensive ethnic slur.
So poor little EVRA is the villain NOT Suarez
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
I’m not sure where you’re getting that from. That’s the first time I’ve heard of it at all. I would be surprised if Evra knew that term.
Aces
February 17, 2012
Evra is fluent in spanish. And their conversation (which resulted in the racism accusation against Suarez) was in spanish.
steve
December 22, 2011
The club and us the fans and everyone feels let down.Show us the evidence and we’ll sh*t our mouth,till then THERE ARE NO EVIDENCE!!And how can you say that it took FA 2 months and then they must have found the solution for that time??3 people voted for Suarez to be banned for 8 games,one of them a friend of Ferguson??Now go tell me that they arent biased.It’s like putting me as a referee in a game at Old Trafford,final minutes on 1-1 scoreline and the striker from the away team fells inside the box.You think i wouldnt give it a penalty?lol.It’s unfair to claim that Suarez is a racist when there are no evidence.If Suarez was guilty,would Liverpool still support him the way they do?Not of course,tells you something that the club risks anything cauz they know that SUarez is innocent.And what i cant get about the rest fans of premierleague clubs is that you hear that Suarez is a racist and he is banned for 8 games and you go on and boo him and make him feel bad.While nothing’s been said on Terry,where there are evidence and nothing’s been said on Rooney where he elbowed another player and got his ban reduced from 3 to 2 games,lol.FA are corrupted,sentencing Suarez 8 games is NOT EVEN CLOSE,Suarez should be banned 2-3 games for the gesture on Fulham fans,if that would happen,where there are evidence,we all Liverpool fans would s**t our mouth and listen.But Luis is judged a racist right now without having done anything bad,Evra should be banned on the other hand for lying.He did the same on Finnan,go search google if you dont remember it.
WE ARE ALL BEHIND LUIS
YOU WILL NEVER WALK ALONE LUIS
FA ARE CORRUPTED,EVERYBODY GO AND KISS FERGUSON’S ARSE SUCKERS
YNWA KENNY YNWA LUIS
jj
December 22, 2011
Paula you have just made the same mistake as the FA you only commented on what Suarez said and missed out the racial insult that Evra used in Sudaca this is what has inflamed the race row that Evra as not been charged under FA rules of discrimination.
Fans aren’t ignorant they just want a fair trail and both players treated equally and not just because one player is black!
Marty
December 22, 2011
twat
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
Why would the FA hand out an 8 game ban without any evidence? Suárez’s own testament will be what did it.
The FA are terribly inept but would not hand such a delicate case like this without something supporting it.
Marty
December 22, 2011
This is all very confusing.
Liverpool in their statement said Suarez didn’t hear Evra insulting him…So, how could it have possibly started the row???? You guys are not making any sense at all. The lady (“who doesnt care about Liverpool FC”) speaks of what she calls her family and friends (Negro or negrito). Just because that’s acceptabe in your country doesnt mean its acceptable in this country. IN fact it’s not acceptable. if youre so outraged by the culture in this country you know what to do! Suarez is guilty of using abusive laguage to a fellow footballer. Ignorance is not a defence and LFC are partly responsible for this by not educating their players. LIverpool FC are a joke for the way they handled this issue.
jj
December 22, 2011
We would also like to know when the FA intend to charge Patrice Evra with making abusive remarks to an opponent after he admitted himself in his evidence to insulting Luis Suarez in Spanish in the most objectionable of terms. Luis, to his credit, actually told the FA he had not heard the insult.
(lFC Offical statement)
Suarez might not have heard it but Evra admited he said it !
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
@JJ – To his credit? What if he actually didn’t hear the insult? It’s not Casablanca.
The reason Evra wasn’t charged is almost certainly because what Evra said was not racial.
jj
December 22, 2011
A Participant shall at all times act in the best interests of the game and shall not
act in any manner which is improper or brings the game into disrepute or use any
one, or a combination of, violent conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive,
indecent or insulting words or behaviour.
(2) In the event of any breach of Rule E 3(1) including a reference to any one or more
of a person’s ethnic origin, colour, race, nationality, faith, gender, sexual orientation
or disability (an “aggravating factor”), a Regulatory Commission shall consider
the imposition of an increased sanction, taking into account the following entry
points:
(FA RULES)
Evra has brought the game into disrepute with a comment that is racist in South America.
Don’t the Rules of racism don’t count when a South American is insulted to you your last comment sounds racist to me you happy for a player to be abused.
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
@JJ South America isn’t a race. There are many races in South America.
Then the only reason that Evra wasn’t charged is because Suarez didn’t hear it.
“your last comment sounds racist to me you happy for a player to be abused.” – Not sure where you’re getting that from.
jj
December 22, 2011
The term used was Sudaco which is a racist term to South Americans used by the Spanish to insult South American imigrants, they say it is like calling them the N word could be why Suarez came back with what he said.
Richard Cole
December 23, 2011
@JJ I really don’t know where you’re getting this “sudaco” stuff from.
jj
December 23, 2011
Went and did some searching !The Uruguay Goverment they claim this is the word (insult) that was said to Suarez I am pretty sure they aren’t going to lie now are they ?
nick
December 22, 2011
YNWA = my arse!
LFC should have taught Suarez certain words that are NOT allowed in the UK.
Negrito = little black fella.
LFC is making a joke of themselves by putting on a suarez shirt.
LFC said Evra racially abused Suarez in Spanish but surprisingly suarez himself admitted he didn’t hear the insult.
Ha ha. LFC, time to accept it n move on
Paula
December 22, 2011
After reading this as an English speaking Uruguayan, I must inform you that yes ‘negrito’ or ‘negrita’ can be used to describe friends in endearing terms, but it also a common insult used in our country when talking about coloured people who you are not friendly with. It is still a word used in a racial discriminatory way here in south america.
I am not fully aware about all the stuff with Luis Suarez, but it should be made clear that even in Uruguay/south america, the words negrito/negrita/negro are used in and offensive way as an insult.
I hope that helps clear some of the ignorance up you guys have been showing over the last few comments.
Varun
December 22, 2011
You are an English so how can you know about the cultures of South America?? That’s a puzzling point!!! I know what you’re trying to do and you completely missed it!!!! You should have refered that you are an Uruguayan speaking english!!!! Suarez is being backed by the Gov of Uruguay!!!! So you think you know better than them?? PorqE negrita???
jj
December 22, 2011
Paula you have just made the same mistake as the FA you only commented on what Suarez said and missed out the racial insult that Evra used in Sudaca this is what has inflamed the race row that Evra as not been charged under FA rules of discrimination.
Fans aren’t ignorant they just want a fair trail and both players treated equally and not just because one player is black!
Thomas Wright
December 22, 2011
This article is obviously written by an idiot. Leaks about this case came from “top Manchester United officials” NOT from Liverpool. He Obviously only believes what Furguson says in his childish benign press conferences !
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
Interesting. A link to that?
Also. Kenny Dalglish didn’t say anything then?
Varun
December 22, 2011
Well well well… So if Liverpool remained quiet would you what would have really happened with them?? With your red nose manager putting his nose everywhere!!!! Why didn’t manchester united comment on the incident was because they knew they were going to win the case!!! How couldn’t they not win when the FA is fungus’s toy?? That is really becoming a joke which in the future will explode in their faces!!!! How come Suarez is having so much support not just by Liverpool but by even the Gov of Uruguay and Ian Wright!!! Evra is only being backed by people connected to United and the FA who are defending themselves!!!! For me the FA is corrupted and should be prosecuted!!!! How can someone inflict a ban of 8 matches on the word of another man??? That’s disgusting!!!! Which comes to the point that it was Suarez’s word against Evra’s word!!! and Evra won on the case!!!! Isn’t that siding a Man United player?? How can you define that?? And saying that Suarez has previous cases going against him!!! So you think that a man cannot change?? So why after cheating his wife a man says that he won’t do that again and he will change etc??? So he’s lying?? So a man can never change?? Is the BPL reserved to only british players??!!!! If not then the country should be able to accept the different cultural differences that exist in the world and to accept the persons migrating to UK as they are!!! If this continues I doubt players from abroad would be interested in joining the BPL!!!! And you can’t say that the BPL will be as interesting with only british players, can you???
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
You do realise that the FA, shitty though they are, would not have made a verdict like this just from taking one players word over another, right?
Suárez, as far as I’m aware, doesn’t have any previous cases like this.
Marty
December 22, 2011
Are you really that stupid?? Suarez admitted saying these things for god sake cop on! The case did not hinge on Evra’s word against Suarez.
Brian
December 22, 2011
With your comment in relation to Clubs losing their connection from its fan base and the one sided tone of your article you are obviously a Man U fan. LFC stance on this issue is a complete understanding of the feelings of its fan base, anything less than the clubs excellent response would have alienated the owners and management from the fan base. LFC’s refusal to allow our great club be used as a pawn in the FA’s grudge against Sepp Blater shows the unity and strength which a great club needs, unlike the faceless Marketing machine that is Man U. LUIS SUAREZ IS INNOCENT YNWA
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
I complimented Liverpool for still being connected with its fanbase – read the second paragraph again.
Suárez isn’t innocent and I sometimes walk alone.
PooBar
December 22, 2011
Steve – you’re an imbecile.
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
Take that, Steve!
gav
December 22, 2011
Its a shame that this wasnt a more balanced piece but of course LFC fans see things one way and people like yourself see it the other.
Perhaps we all need to wait for the official details to come out of the FA as to why they brought the charge? That way you can write a piece that includes facts! Mind you it’ll probably be another two months until we get that
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
I fully intend to write another piece when the FA slowly (if ever) give a report on everything. It should make for an interesting read.
Marty
December 22, 2011
It’s a pity Liverpool and KK (he needs another K) didn’t wait for the report. They might not have written the embarrassing statement and worn those embarressing t-shirts last night.
jj
December 22, 2011
Evra is a racist as well but the FA have over looked it simply because South Americans are a minority in England so the FA are happy for the racism to go on as long as they keep the majority happy which is black players in the leagues.
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
South Americans are a minority in England? I’d say there are more South Americans in England than Frenchmen.
That second bit you said sounded racist.
jj
December 22, 2011
FA have gone after a mixed race player from Uruguay to prove a point on Racism if they had thrown the book at an English player instead it would have held more integrity world wide, racism has gone on for years and we decide to hit a foriegn player with racism has if no white footballer has been racist in the last 50 years since imigration .
pegamequemegusta
December 22, 2011
I must say I agree with almost all of the semi-coherent stuff above. While you’re right to point out Liverpool ignored the request for clubs to keep schtum during the investigation, it was equally poor for the FA to give their ruling without the details, without spelling out immediately the basis for the decision. It shouldn’t take a shrewd parsing of the few available details, as we have here, to clear up where we’re at. The FA were well aware of the attention the matter was going to receive and the potential for nigh-on irrevocable defamation that would result. Liverpool’s somewhat scaldy response has been facilitated by this laxity, this lack of clarity. It’s ridiculous that even after a two-month investigation we’re still rather unsure as to exactly what was said and how. Even if a delay in the explanation for a ruling is commonplace, in a case like this an exception should have been made. This is especially relevant as in order for a real gesture to be made in the Fight Against Racism, the ruling had to be as utterly unquestionable as the sanction was tough. I think they’ve messed this up.
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
I absolutely agree. They should have been far more transparent with what actually happened at the same time as they gave their verdict. It would have made things far easier on the clubs and players involved and especially the fans.
Matt
December 22, 2011
Steve, you are so misinformed it’s sad.
A couple more spineless articles like this one and you’ll really have a regular place on crappy little sites like this one!
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
Yeah Steve. Stop writing these articles – whoever you are.
Claus
December 22, 2011
Whatabout calling a person South American isnt. That racist?? Pr is it only negro?!
Sam
December 22, 2011
Given that South American’s aren’t a race, no it’s not racist. In the same way this whole thing wouldn’t be happening if Suarez had made a comment about Evra’s French background.
Sam
December 22, 2011
Liverpudlians aren’t a race are they? So no, it’s not racism. And you’re right, he isn’t guilty of racism, which is why he wasn’t found guilty of racism. He was found guilty of using a racist term. The two are quite different.
guest
December 22, 2011
@ Richard Cole
“forgiven for thinking the Liverpool Football Club PR department was run by a various assortment of passionate scouse bloggers.”
hmmmm “scouse bloggers” I COULD EASILY TAKE THAT AS OFFENSIVE AND A RACIST COMMENT. Does that make you a racist?
You can see how easily things can get misunderstood even if no offence was ever intended.
I think the charge was incorrect, maybe guilty of misconduct but certainly not racism.
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
Is scouse a race now? I’m fairly sure would be a city-ist comment or county-ist.
He’s not guilty of racism, he’s guilty of using an insult that included a reference to skin colour.
guest
December 22, 2011
Race is a classification system used to categorize humans into large and distinct populations or groups, and I guess that includes distinct regional groups too.
your second sentence is correct, however due to typical media behaviour and their knack for sticking the knife in, he is being portrayed as a racist and that is now being transferred to the terraces as seen on Tuesday night when LFC played Wigan. When Kenny was appointed manager the media loved LFC, now the honey moon is over the knives are out. The media are using and portraying Suarez as a racist as it makes news and sells their papers etc, now the truth will get clouded and all that will be left will be the fabricated stories of the press AND this is where the FA are at fault, they have not produced any evidence or documentation yet to support their justification for the 8 game ban and fine.
Towson Tom
December 22, 2011
What bothers me about the afair is that the kind of punishment given to Suarez opens the door to clubs to “get rid” of a player playing for another club for a great part of the season, a player in this case that would definitely make a difference to where Liverpool finish at the end of the season I am a Liverpool red through and through so I must make it quite clear that I do not think that Sir Alex or Mr Evra had anything like that in mind but it does open the door to that sort of tactic in the future by ANY club wishing to obtain an unfair advantage. Please dont tell me it would’nt happen – you only have to look at the number of times players on the field try to get opposing players sent off. For me the way forward is to fine the guilty player (and I am not saying Suarez is) two or three months wages.
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
Are you saying that Evra made it up then? I don’t think this would be the outcome if he had.
fairplaytoall
December 22, 2011
O K – so you think Evra is a SAINT – United are silent because the FA loves them
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
Evra’s no saint.
fairplaytoall
December 22, 2011
Were the F A panel members those who promised that England woulld get the World Cup and then slagged off everyone and everybody because they received ZERO VOTES
Ashfah Hussain
December 22, 2011
The England FA is rotten to the core.
sicnarf
December 22, 2011
absolute crap.Is this supposed to be journalism. More pro-united regurgitated nonsense
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
This isn’t supposed to be journalism.
godfather
December 22, 2011
NO need for any debate. English FA favours Man Utd, period. Your examples of racist incidences involving Evra show that there’s something wrong with him; he must be such a good provocateur, not just in the way he tries to harm opponents but by his words too, to attract racist remarks (IF Luis Suarez did indeed said it).
Marty
December 22, 2011
I’d like to see the evidence of the FA’s Bias towards UTD! or is it just you word?
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
Every fan thinks the FA is biased against them, every fan is right and wrong.
What you’re saying is Evra has deserved it?
David
December 22, 2011
What a load of shit. Fucking biased twats
grauxie
December 22, 2011
English FA has NO spine nor backbone. They are totally afraid of Ferguson and shows favouritism towards Man Utd, and this opinion comes across the football world abroad. Evra? Having followed football for many years, we certainly knew how provocativeEvra is on the pitch. Racism knows no colors, so dont even begin to think Evra was not racist towards Suarez.
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
Yes the FA has no spine and an emphatic NO they’re not biased against United.
Evra is no saint.
yuva seegoolam
December 22, 2011
If suarez really abused him in racist terms or had really intended, do you think he would hve admitted doing so? If there’s compelling evidence as some are claiming, why take two months? Why so long a delay to make public on what grounds or material elements the sentence was given? If Evra was so hurt, why did he say he doesn’t think Suarez is a racist? Or is it a sign of guilt? A big coincidence which is being overlooked by many. Look at the timing of Tery’s case announcement. suarez is punished . the next day hearing of Terry’s case announced : schedule for february 1st. Odd really odd.
Richard Cole
December 22, 2011
I think Suárez has admitted to using the word “negrito” I don’t think Suárez has realised what can and cannot be said. You can say racist things without being a racist and you can be racist without saying racist things.
I personally don’t think Luis Suárez is racist but I do think he said what could be described as a racist term.
guest
December 23, 2011
Correct Richard, people need to take a step back and actually remember Suarez was not found guilty of racism. People are putting 2 an 2 together and coming up with 5. The ignorance towards what constitutes racism can be seen in all the posts on the internet regarding this particular incident, a lot of folks just can’t seem to grasp what racism is and therefore make uneducated comments like we now see.
roadender
December 22, 2011
So the word of Evra is accepted “I was racially abused” but the word of Suarez is not “It was not a racial slur”. As someone earlier said, Negito CAN be used offensively, but Suarez said he did not use it so. Doudle standards by the FA
Sam
December 22, 2011
He didn’t use it offensively during a high intensity match against fierce rivals, with someone he is not even remotely friendly with? That’s not double standards, that’s logic at play.
Also you do realise that the FA were not the one’s who found Suarez guilty right? It was an independent panel, featuring a QC and two others whom both clubs had a veto over, if they were not happy with them.
Peter
December 22, 2011
FA favours Man Utd!!! ?? Would you all wise the fuck up…… Rio Ferdinand got an 8 Month Ban & Eric Cantona got a 9 Month Ban, Suarez got an 8 MATCH ban……quit ur crying and stop thinking your all hard done by.
Suarez himself admitted to using the word, but isnt it up to Liverpool FC to let their players know whats right or wrong to do or say on the football pitch even if he didnt mean any malice by it?? Your all looking at this through tinted glasses………he should accept the ban and move on! The more you appeal or argue against this the stupider your looking, fans & the club!
Veo
December 26, 2011
How much have you been paid by Fergie to write this shit? Suarez may have called Evra “negro”, but Evra called Suarez a nigger when he yelled “sudaca”. That is the truth, but you only want revenge against Suarez for that handball against Ghana. Shameful!
Trey
November 16, 2012
I’m not sure where you are getting your info, but good topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more. Thanks for magnificent information I was looking for this information for my mission.
Accounting Degrees
December 12, 2012
I am sure this article has touched all the internet viewers, its really really fastidious article on building up new blog.
facebook.com
December 23, 2012
What adds onto the pressure about the employer is always
that Construction Management Jobs Openings may need to be filled in fast if she has clients presenting Construction Projects to become bidded on.
” The answer is no, but also in order to reduce the potential problems associated with projects, it can help to clearly identify the resources open to the LEA for resolution of issues. Managers with this field are educated to oversee the design, design and actual building of construction projects.
Maximo
January 2, 2013
There are lots of ways to reward your good tenants showing your appreciation with their business.
Most commercial real estate investors usually are passive investors that will not take an engaged role in the day to day
management of these real estate holdings. Essentially, property management Melbourne behaves as a
type of buffer between the dog owner of the exact property and the
tenants that occupy these properties.